![]()  | ||
| Observing the fires on the Carmel. | 
As I prepare to join my Jim Joseph Foundation Fellowship colleagues in Israel, I was dismayed, then heartened then dismayed again by the news. Dismayed by the wildfire that raged near Haifa. Heartened by the outpouring of support and aid from all over the world, including three firetrucks that crossed the Green Line from the Palestinian Authority to fight the blaze. And then dismayed by the odious declaration of 50 "rabbis" who banned the rental or sale of property to non-Jews. Then I came across this article published in the Jerusalem Post (thank you Facebook Wall) from my teacher 
Rabbi Michael Marmur. Now davka, that's a rabbi!
Rabbi Michael Marmur. Now davka, that's a rabbi!
This fire is still burning: Racism is spreading
             12/07/2010 23:21                  
Rabbis' ban on the rental or sale of property to non-Jews demonstrates lack of  understanding for the basic currency of life in a liberal democracy.
Fifty Orthodox rabbis, most of them recipients of state funding, have just  declared a ban on the rental or sale of property to non-Jews. They cite a number  of halachic precedents, including the fear of intermarriage which apparently  will ensue if such property deals are concluded. They also note that prices will  fall if such transactions take place. It’s the Aramaic version of “there goes  the neighborhood.”
If we allow these declarations to pass with no  comment, there goes Judaism. If the true voice of Judaism is one which provides  a mandate for bigotry and a license for racism, then our crisis is of epic  proportions.
There are precedents for the position adopted by the 50  saintly rabbis. The Bible itself does not read like an advertisement for  intergroup dialogue.
The questions then become: How do you understand the  essence of Judaism, and how long are you prepared to stay silent as the soul of  Judaism is kidnapped? The declaration by these rabbis is shameful, harmful and  wrong. Its argumentation may be sound, but its core is putrid. It demonstrates a  breathtaking lack of understanding for the basic currency of life in a liberal  democracy.
I just heard a very moving interview on the radio with Yona  Yahav, the mayor of Haifa. He is no Jewish scholar, nor does he pretend to be.  But as mayor of a city in which Jews and Arabs try to live together, he pointed  out the obscenity of the rabbinic ruling and contrasted it with the displays of  solidarity and good citizenship which characterized the past few days in the  North. Jews and Arabs (and others too) fought the fire together, and often  demonstrated great heroism and humanity in the process.
Last week, before  the fire in the Carmel, evidence of the smouldering embers of bigotry was  provided by a major survey conducted by the Israel Democracy Institute. It found  that 53% of the Jewish public believes that the state is entitled to encourage  Arabs to emigrate from Israel. I wonder if the 53% are prepared to think through  the implications of this kind of ‘encouragement,’ and if the remaining 47% are  ready and able to dampen these flames before all control is lost.
I am a  bleeding-heart liberal. My heart is indeed bleeding, but not perhaps for the  reason commonly attributed. It is true that the victims of this kind of  intolerance deserve our sympathy.
My heart goes out to every non-Jewish  citizen of this country whenever they are the victims of inequity. But it is for  Judaism that my heart bleeds; if it cannot show the kind of moral focus and  conceptual suppleness needed to face up to the challenges of the day. Bigotry  makes us stupid, and it puts the success of our enterprise at risk. A Judaism  which enjoins me to deny the civil rights and human dignity of any person does  not deserve the monopoly on the brand name, nor is it worthy of state  funding.
Judaism should never add fuel to our basest prejudices and  lowest emotions. It is meant to give form to our highest aspirations and deepest  yearnings.
WE ARE coming to the end of Chanukah, our fire festival. Some  see it as a mandate for intolerance.
After all, Mattathias lashed out  against the Hellenizing assimilators. Here again, the question at stake is how  you understand Judaism. Are the candles symbols of bigotry or of boundary  maintenance, of hatred or of hope? The fire in the Carmel is finally out. The  fire of racism and intolerance is still burning. Indeed, it is spreading. If you  are a Jew who cares about Judaism and Israel, regardless of your denominational  affiliation, you need to stand up and say: This rabbinic ruling is wrong. Those  within the four ells of halachic discourse will conduct the struggle from their  vantage point. Those outside will use the tools available to them.
This  fire threatens all. We have to douse the flames of bigotry with the life-giving  waters which flow within a Judaism of humanity. Why don’t all those who strive  for such a Judaism get our act together? We learned in this last crisis that  when the situation is urgent, rivals and even enemies can cooperate. This fire  is still burning. It is time to sound the alarm.
The writer is vice  president for academic affairs of the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of  Religion.
